Bruncvík’s story shows how various mythologies got intertwined around the Charles bridge. It is a focal point for much culture and history and has a special place in Czech hearts. As such, its care is always a topic for heated discussions. There have been various reconstructions of the bridge due to damage from floods and general wear and tear. The latest fix-up, started in 2007 and meant to last till 2020, has been dogged by controversy from the get-go. The British company Mott MacDonald that the Prague City Hall hired to carry out the repairs has been accused of damaging the original stones, replacing the old stones with new ones that don´t look the same, not duplicating the original stone-cutting methods, using “unsuitable” mortar (probably no eggs, milk or wine) and seemingly doing everything in its power to rid the bridge of its historic, artistic and cultural value. The City Hall and the company have denied such charges. Curiously, last year the City Hall fined itself 54,000 CZK for not carrying out a survey of the national monument. Yet it does not admit that this or the actions of their contractor are in any way damaging the bridge. The latest salvo in the public relations war has been fired earlier this year by the Plzeň regional authority which carried out its own review of the renovations (to avoid bias) and fined the Prague City Hall 3.23 Million CZK for making “irreversible mistakes” in handling the reconstruction. The City Hall is vowing to fight the fine while preservationists are hoping it will hire a different company to finish the reconstruction, which is yet to begin the most significant phase that involves all pillars and arches.